What Exactly is LTAD? How Do Parents and Athletes Make the Correct Choices?
Reading “The Race to Nowhere in Youth Sports” (click on the top article in the Specific Topics Column to the right) brings up many issues that confront parents of young athletes. I would suggest reading it first and then reading my thoughts here.
When I was young (many decades ago) there were only two Youth Sports for boys that existed where I lived; Little League Baseball (ages 9-12) and AAU Swimming (ages 8 > 18). Girls had the Swim Club and Baton Club (yes, Baton Twirling!!) and that was IT.
But, in those days, schools taught the Fundamental Movement Skills (FMS) beginning in Kindergarten and continuing through Junior High School. Even more important, PE was mandatory every day in JR. High and High School. Five, Six and Seven Year Olds were taught Basic Motor Skills BEFORE being introduced into Advanced Motor Skills. By the time children were in Sixth Grade, they had a large and varied “Movement Vocabulary” that made transition into Jr. High sports successful for many students who were participating in Basketball, Flag Football, Track and Field, Softball, etc. In addition, many minor sports (Volleyball, Wrestling, Gymnastics, etc.) were introduced.
The disappearance of this valuable PHYSICAL EDUCATION, in favor of playing recreational games with little or no instruction along with the elimination of daily PE instruction for Elementary Schools created a severe lack of both physical activity AND the development of Basic and Advanced Motor Skills (or Movement Skills).
Rigorous Physical Fitness programs in Jr. High and High Schools (along with Fitness Testing with comparison to the National Norms…remember the President’s Fitness Test?) were also eliminated.
This void of physical instruction and regular physical activity in the schools gave rise to many youth sports offered through various sources such as City Rec. Departments and parent groups forming Sports Leagues through associations already established like Little League, Pony League, etc.
As “The Race to Nowhere in Youth Sports” points out “The path is a race to nowhere, and it does not lead to better athletes. It produces bitter athletes who get hurt, burnout and quit sports altogether”.
There are many reasons for these assertions and many studies and large volumes of data to prove the claims. BUT, there are better choices for parents and young athletes who truly want to develop as athletes. LTAD, or Long Term Athlete Development, involves a step-by-step plan to best develop the “total athlete” BEFORE deciding to specialize in a particular sport AT THE RIGHT AGE.
The various paths open to parents and young, aspiring athletes for successful preparation for later sports success can be chosen with proper education on all the research data and the kind of information that I will attempt to provide with articles and research like to the two that I have added below that may be useful. You may also click on the 2nd link under Specific Topics to read a current article on Vanderbilt winning the College Baseball World Series and the LTAD their athletes prescribed to. MORE TO COME…as Stuart McMillan recommends, Analyze and Synthesize!
Effectiveness of early sport specialization limited in most sports, sport diversification may be better approach at young ages
:
April
23, 2013
American
Medical Society for Sports Medicine
Ever-increasing requirements for success in
competitive sports has created added pressure for young athletes to train with
greater intensity at earlier ages. The goal to become the next Olympian or more
commonly, to obtain a college scholarship, motivates many parents to encourage
their children to specialize in one sport at a young age. This has resulted in
an increased demand for year-round sport training programs, facilities and
products. But is this approach really an effective way to generate long-term
success in competitive athletics?
Ever-increasing
requirements for success in competitive sports has created added pressure for
young athletes to train with greater intensity at earlier ages. The goal to
become the next Olympian or more commonly, to obtain a college scholarship,
motivates many parents to encourage their children to specialize in one sport
at a young age. This has resulted in an increased demand for year-round sport
training programs, facilities and products. But is this approach really an
effective way to generate long-term success in competitive athletics?
John P. DiFiori, MD, President of the
American Medical Society for Sports Medicine, Chief of the Division of Sports
Medicine and Non-Operative Orthopaedics at the David Geffen School of Medicine
at UCLA and Team Physician for the UCLA Department of Intercollegiate
Athletics, says that few who specialize in one sport at a very young age make
it to elite levels. "With the exception of select sports such as
gymnastics in which the elite competitors are very young, the best data we have
would suggest that the odds of achieving elite levels with this method are
exceedingly poor. In fact, some studies indicate that early specialization is
less likely to result in success than participating in several sports as a
youth, and then specializing at older ages."
Dr. DiFiori encourages youth attempt to a
variety of sports and activities. He says this allows children to discover
sports that they enjoy participating in, and offers them the opportunity to
develop a broader array of motor skills. In addition, this may have the added
benefit of limiting overuse injury and burnout.
A UCLA sports specialization study surveying
296 NCAA Division I male and female athletes, average age 19, found that 88
percent participated in an average of two to three sports as a children, and 70
percent did not specialize in one sport until after the age of 12. In a similar
study of Olympians in Germany, results found that on average, the Olympians had
participated in two other sports during childhood before or parallel to their
main sport. Both studies support the concept of sports diversification in
adolescence -- not specialization.
In his nearly 20 years serving as a team
physician for the UCLA Department of Intercollegiate Athletics, Dr. DiFiori
appreciates the benefits of sports participation in general -- increased
self-esteem, self-discipline, development of leadership qualities and social
skills, and overall health and well-being. But he warns external pressure on a
child to train and compete in one sport at an early age may cause more harm
than good. Social isolation, lack of independence, preferential treatment,
abusive relationship, burnout and injury are some of the potential negative
effects.
"Physical activity contributes to a
happy and healthy childhood," says Dr. DiFiori, "however, parents,
coaches and children should monitor and measure their involvement level in a
singular sport against the overall well-being and future success of the
participant."
Dr. DiFiori presented, "Early Sports
Participation: A Prescription for Success?" on Thursday, April 18, 2013,
at the annual meeting of the American Medical Society for Sports Medicine in
San Diego, Calif.
Sports specialization, hours spent in organized sports may predict young athlete injury
October
28, 201
American
Academy of Pediatrics
Athletes ages eight to 18 who spend twice as
many hours per week in organized sports than in free play, and especially in a
single sport, are more likely to be injured.
Athletes
ages 8 to 18 who spend twice as many hours per week in organized sports than in
free play, and especially in a single sport, are more likely to be injured,
according to an abstract presented Monday, Oct. 28 at the American Academy of
Pediatrics (AAP) National Conference and Exhibition in Orlando.
The study, "Risks of Specialized
Training and Growth for Injury in Young Athletes: A Prospective Cohort
Study," found athletes who played more hours per week than their age --
for example, an 8-year-old who played more than 8 hours per week -- were more
likely to be injured. In addition, athletes who spend more than twice as much
time in organized sports than in free play, whatever their age or sport, are
more likely to be injured and have serious overuse injuries.
The study involved more than 1,200 child and
adolescent athletes who came to one of two Chicago hospitals and affiliated
clinics for either a sports-related injury or a sports physical. Researchers
collected information from each patient at enrollment, including the intensity
and length of training, degree of sports specialization, Tanner stage (a
measure of physical development), and height and weight. The same data was
collected from each participant at 6-month intervals for up to three years
between 2010 and 2012.
The degree of sports specialization was
determined by a 6-point score based on whether or not the athlete: Trains more
than 75 percent of the time in one sport; trains to improve skill; misses time
with friends; has quit other sports to focus on one sport; considers one sport
more important than other sports; regularly travels out of state; trains more
than eight months a year or competes more than six months per year.
"The young athletes who more intensely
specialized in a single sport were more likely to have an injury and a serious
overuse injury," which typically keeps athletes out of play for a longer
period of time, said lead study author Neeru Jayanthi, MD.
There were 837 injured participants with 859
unique injuries, and 360 uninjured participants. Injured athletes were older
than uninjured athletes (14 +/- 2.2 years vs. 12.9 +/- 2.6 years), reported a
higher average number of hours per week playing organized sports (11.3 +/- 6.9
hours vs. 9.4 +/-8.2 hours), and higher average hours per week in total sports
activity including gym, free play and organized sports activities (19.7 hours
+/- 9 hours vs. 17.6 +/- 10.3).
Injured athletes also had significantly
higher sports specialization scores than uninjured athletes (3.3+/- 1.6 vs. 2.7
+/- 1.6), even after adjusting for hours per week in total sports activity and
age.
"We found that kids on average play
organized sports nearly twice as much as free play," said Dr. Jayanthi.
"Those kids who exceed that two-to-one ratio are more likely to be injured."
"Our next goal is to research whether
educating parents and kids about this ratio of time spent in sports versus free
play, and providing them with more specific guidelines, will reduce overuse
injuries in youth sports," said co-investigator Cynthia R. LaBella, MD,
FAAP.
